Print Page  |  Report Abuse  |  Sign In  |  Register
NAMSAP April 2018 Newsletter
Share |













NAMSAP Quarterly Newsletter

Volume 11, Number 1 | April 2018

•  Letter from NAMSAP President
•  2018 National Educational Conference Information
•  Webinar Highlights
•  Regulation Update
•  Committee Updates

01 | Letter from NAMSAP President

By: Rita Wilson
Chief Executive Officer
Tower MSA Partners


Dear NAMSAP Members:

Welcome sweet springtime!  As we look ahead in anticipation of the onset of spring, I wanted to take this opportunity to share with each of you the results achieved over the past 3 months and to highlight the work that continues on behalf of NAMSAP. Below you will find a recap of the initiatives put in play this quarter through the combined efforts of Julie’s team at Association Management Strategies (AMS) and the NAMSAP board of directors, committees and membership.  To be sure, Q1 has been both busy and productive!

One of the most exciting initiatives of 2018 has been to extend NAMSAP’s advocacy to CMS to stop the institutionalization of opioids over life expectancy that continues under its review process for WCMSAs. Through the leadership of Gary Patureau and Amy Bilton, the EBM Committee is aggressively seeking to extend national awareness of this issue through communication with national organizations and legislators, and also via direct dialogue with CMS.  Toward that end, I am pleased to announce that on April 5, 2018, letters were sent from NAMSAP’s EBM Committee Co-chairs, Gary Patureau and Amy Bilton, to all Congressional delegates to educate them as to what is happening under CMS’s WCMSA review and to communicate the initiatives taken by NAMSAP to recommend policy changes in support of evidence based medicine in CMS’s review of opioids in the MSA.  More information and to review the full package submitted to each delegate, go to  The letters will be followed by digital communications to each member to offer further dialogue to explain what is happening and to encourage their support of our efforts to modify CMS’s behavior.

As mentioned in January’s letter, with education at the forefront of NAMSAP’s mission, a key objective of the education committee was to set topics and schedule dates for the 12 webinars planned in 2018.  The first three webinars are already behind us! Looking Ahead to 2018, presented on February 27, 2018 by Dan Anders, Esq. (Tower MSA Partners), Rasa Fumagalli, J.D. (Nyhan, Bambrick, Kinzie, & Lowry), and Ciara Koba, Esq. (Burns & White), Intro to ODG, presented on March 13, 2018 by Tom Farrell (ODG), and WCMSA - An Update, presented by Leslie Schumacher, RN, CRRN, CCM, CLCP, CNLCP, MSCC, CMSP, CMSP-F (PlanPoint) and Kimberly Wiswell, CMSP (Medval), and all were extremely well received by the attendees with the ODG webinar coming in as one of the highest attended webinars in NAMSAP history.  (As a reminder, access to ODG can be purchased at a significant discount to active NAMSAP members.  For more information and to purchase, please email

Webinars scheduled for the remainder of 2018 are listed below and can also be found at  The May 15th webinar announcement was released last week with registration information available at on the NAMSAP website. Webinar topics slated for 2018 include:

  • Opioids in the MSA – Part III (June 19, 2018)
  • Medicare Part C (July 17, 2018)
  • REDBOOK (August 14, 2018)
  • MSA Cost Mitigation Strategies (September 1, 2018)
  • Case Law Update (October 3, 2018)
  • ODG – How, Where and When to Use? (October 26, 2018)
  • LMSA Update (November 13, 2018)     
  • Annual Ethics Update (December 18, 2018)
  • Year in Review (January 15, 2019)

Another strategic goal for 2018 is to share NAMSAP’s industry knowledge and expertise by creating our own Speakers’ Bureau.  As an adjunct to its use internally to support NAMSAP webinars, NAMSAP Advisor newsletter content and NAMSAP’s Annual Educational Conference, this service will extend NAMSAP’s expertise outside of our organization and places NAMSAP at the forefront of education in the MSP industry. If you haven’t already done so, I encourage each member to complete the Speakers’ Bureau Survey and begin to share your knowledge.

As we look ahead to the NAMSAP 2018 National Educational Conference in Baltimore, MD on October 3-5, I hope everyone has take advantage of the Super Early Bird Registration discount and secured a room at the beautiful, historic Lord Baltimore Hotel!  Conference Co-chairs Michelle Allen and Gary Patureau have completed the agenda, and are now actively working to secure speakers from all areas of the MSP industry.   With the newly implemented contractors for the WCRC and CRC, we anticipate active participation by CMS at this year’s conference.  We also expect involvement by legislators who are leading our charge on opioids, and by our own member experts from both the payer and service provider communities. And don’t forget that those who have completed NAMSAP’s MSCC course within the required period of time prior to the conference date can arrange to take the MSCC test prior to conference start date. Please make plans now to join us in Baltimore!

Other activities that began in Q1 and remain ongoing as we continue into Q2, include the following:

  1. Transition of all NAMSAP website information to the industry standard YM platform and established a process to add NEWS, etc. and update our website dynamically.
  2. Implementation of website refresh project to revamp our current website to better represent us as a vibrant, action oriented, driven organization.
  3. Creation of a BOD orientation power point to provide training / orientation to our BOD and Advisory Committee to set appropriate expectations.  This is something NAMSAP, as an organization, never had.
  4. Deployment of a NAMSAP calendar to be shared via the new website to showcase all activities for the year in a single view.
  5. Implementation of a robust educational platform to support the MSCC training program.  Looking ahead this platform may also allow us to take our webinar process to a whole new level of professional presentation abilities.

As you can see, 2018 continues to be an active year for NAMSAP.  As the only non-profit organization dedicated to MSP compliance, we are uniquely positioned to drive change in our industry through collaboration, advocacy and education.  Our 2018 Strategic Plan is dedicated to this purpose. To achieve our collective goals, however, we need the focused efforts and active involvement of every member of this talented organization.

I welcome your feedback on the information shared, and your involvement and support as we continue to push forward.

In the words of Mark Twain, “The secret to getting ahead is to get started.”

NAMSAP Wants to See You at the 2018 National Educational Conference

NAMSAP is now accepting registrations and sponsors for the 2018 Annual Meeting to be held in Baltimore, MD at the Lord Baltimore Hotel, October 3-5, 2018.

Early additions to the annual conference agenda include the following:

  • An update on new CMS policy guidance as it unfolds for LMSAs
  • An analysis from the industry on our new WCRC and CRC with history, key trends and differences. 
  • Participation by CMS, WCRC and CRC to share their to share their guidance as to best practices and expectations
  • For Medicare Advantage Plans, our experts will provide practice points to bring transparency to the communications process

The full agenda will be released soon - but make your plans NOW to attend.  We look forward to seeing you in Baltimore! 


Partner Spotlights



02 | Webinar Highlights


Highlights of The MSP – Looking Ahead to 2018 Webinar

By: Dan Anders, Esq
Tower MSA Partners


In a February 27, 2018, NAMSAP sponsored webinar, Daniel Anders of Tower MSA Partners, Rasa Fumagalli of NuQuest and Ciara Koba of Burns White, presented their views on the past, present and future of MSP compliance.  In this engaging webinar the three MSP compliance attorneys took on major compliance issues such as the July 2017 revised WCMSA Reference Guide, the transition to the new CRC contractor and the potential for CMS liability MSA reviews in 2018. 

Please find below a breakdown of the highlights of the webinar and the following is a link to the recorded webinar:  The MSP - Looking Ahead to 2018

The Past – Recap of 2017 events

  • Capitol Bridge, LLC awarded contract as the new WCRC
  • WCRC contract includes provision to expand MSA reviews to liability as early as July 2018.
  • July 10, 2017 release of revised WCMSA Reference Guide which among many notable items, introduced the Amended Review process, provided guidelines for recognizing state specific statutes for limiting medical care in the MSA and recommended professional MSA administration.

Present – Notable Current Events

  • Details on the transition to the new Commercial Recovery Center contractor, Performant, LLC
  • What’s new with the CMS portals?
  • Developments in the class action lawsuits filed by MSP Recovery, LLC, against no-fault insurers
  • Introduction of the new Medicare ID

Future - Expectations for 2018 and Beyond

  • Possible expansion of CMS MSA review process to liability settlements
  • Addressing opioids in MSAs
  • Continued Medicare Advantage Plan litigation


Partner Spotlights




03 | Regulation Update


A Detailed Look at the Amended Review Process
By: Rasa Fumagalli J.D., MSCC

Nyhan, Bambrick, Kinzie & Lowry


Version 2.6 of the Workers’ Compensation Medicare Set-Aside Arrangement Reference Guide (“Reference Guide”) released on July 10, 2017, introduced the “Amended Review” process in Section 16.3. This addition was greeted with enthusiasm since it now allows parties, who were unable to settle their claim after receipt of the initial CMS determination, to ask CMS to review an updated MSA based on the claimant’s current medical condition provided certain conditions are met.  A closer examination of these pre-requisites is warranted in order to ensure that CMS will actually consider the request for re-review.

Pre-requisites for the Amended Review

Section 16.3 indicates that CMS will permit a one-time request for re-review when the following criteria are met: 1. CMS has issued a conditional approval/approved amount at least 12 months but no more than 48 months prior; 2. The case has not yet settled as of the date of the request for re-review; 3. The projected care has changed so much that the submitter’s new proposed amount would result in a 10% or $10,000.00 change, whichever is greater, in CMS’ previous approval amount; 4. When a re-review request is approved by CMS, the new approved amount will be effective as of the date of the settlement.

In the event that the treatment has changed due to a state specific requirement, there must be a life care plan that shows the replacement treatment for the denied treatment if it is not reflected in the medical records. In addition, CMS will not consider a change that is due to the approval of a new generic version of a medication by the FDA that reduces the cost of the drug projection, to be a sufficient reason for a re-review request. 

In addition to the above requirements, CMS has also outlined a very specific format for the amended review. The submission must have the following: a new cover letter, all medical documentation related to the settling injury(s)/body part(s) since the previous submission date, the most recent six months of pharmacy records, a Consent to Release information and a summary of the future care. Justification for the change in care must reference the CMS recommendation sheet and identify:  the line items that included care that was already provided; the line items that are no longer required and include the replacement care and add new line items showing any additional care that is needed. Support in the medical records must be provided for each requested change. CMS will decline a review if the submitter fails to provide justification. Submitters are also not allowed to supplement the request for amended review.

Points to Consider when using the Amended Review process

In using the amended review process, parties should be mindful of the provision’s requirement to submit  all medical documentation related to the settling injury(s)/body part(s) since the previous submission date.”  Since the amended review can be pursued up to 48 months from the date of the initial CMS determination, this requirement covers more than the last two years of injury related treatment records that are needed to support an initial CMS proposal submission. In addition, the date of the initial submission will not always be the same as the date of the last medical record that was submitted. In the event that any of these medical records reference treatment with another physician that may arguably be treating the claimant for any of the “settling injury(s)/body part(s), those records must also be secured and factored into the updated MSA.  This is true even though the carrier may not have paid for any of the treatment from the provider that is referenced in another physician’s record. In light of this, careful scrutiny of the new medical records is recommended.

If additional conditions are being added to the settlement, these additional conditions must also be included in the amended review analysis by CMS. If the additional conditions were denied, without any payments made for them, CMS will look for the same type of documentation that would accompany an initial submission with these denied conditions. Payment histories run from the date of the alleged accident and dated within six months of the amended review request will have to be provided in order to support the denial of the conditions. A letter outlining the denied and accepted conditions will also be needed. Since CMS will not allow submitter’s to supplement the amended review, this information must accompany the amended review submission.

The timing of the amended review submission is also important. It should be done with a view towards maximizing the reduction of the allocation, when possible. In cases involving CMS determinations with opioids, the successful implementation of a weaning program would likely yield a significantly lower updated MSA and amended review determination.

The amended review process is beneficial for those who are seeking CMS’ approval of an updated MSA when there is a CMS determination on file. The process however does require that certain conditions be met and that specific documents be provided to CMS.  Given CMS’ strict interpretation of the amended review process, parties should be aware of and prepared to comply with each of the pre-requisites.

Partner Spotlights





      The Hartford

04 | Committee Update


NAMSAP's committees are hard at work pushing forward the association's strategic goals.  Below is a list of the committees and we encourage you to contact the co-chairs to volunteer your expertise as part of the committee.

NAMSAP Advisor would like to recognize and welcome our newest committee co-chair, Dan Anders.  Dan is Chief Compliance Officer for Tower MSA Partners and has served in the MSP industry for more than 13 years.  He is well known to all in NAMSAP and a great addition to NAMSAP’s BOD Advisory Committee.  Dan will serve as committee co-chair along with Katie Fox, Executive VP, Client Account Management for Franco Signor.

Below is an overview of the 1st meeting held in 2018 for the P&L Committee and a call to action for interested parties to join.

NAMSAP Policy and Legislative Committee

The primary purpose of NAMSAP’s Policy and Legislative Committee is to monitor and evaluate applicable case law, CMS policy and federal / state legislation and regulations that affect the MSP industry, and to serve NAMSAP membership by keeping them apprised of such developments, and when applicable, to coordinate grass root efforts through strategic outreach at a local level.

As per new co-chair, Dan Anders, this includes, but is not limited to the following:

  1. Monitor and discuss bills introduced in Congress having a direct or indirect impact on the Medicare Secondary Payer Act or otherwise affecting the MSP industry.
  2. Make recommendations to the NAMSAP board in terms of supporting, opposing or remaining neutral in regard to such proposed legislation.
  3. Based upon the board’s determination as to the bill, implement an Action Plan which consists of advocacy and/or member education.
  4. Continually review issues, both good and bad, with CMS contractors – BCRC, CRC and WCRC. If necessary, contact contractors to request a plan of correction to the problem(s).
  5. Discuss CMS MSA review policies.  Do we want to advocate for change?  Make recommendations to NAMSAP board, and if approved draft a letter to CMS.  Request a meeting with CMS.
  6. Monitor and educate regarding judicial decisions impact on MSP processes.
  7. Defer to other committees such as Evidence Based Committee on opioid issues and the LMSA Advisory Committee regarding LMSA policy.

A summary of the committee’s discussions from the 4/17/2018 meeting were as follows:


  • Uncertain as to status of SPARC Act.
  • Does not appear to be any pending bill or possible re-introduced WCMSA reform bill from UWC.
  • MARC PAID Act – Committee members discussed possible provisions of bill and whether it has been introduced and information obtained from MARC on the bill.  A decision was made to ask Katie Fox to provide a summary and answer questions about the bill at the next committee meeting.    A question to consider will be whether NAMSAP should take a position on the bill.

Administrative/Regulatory:  The committee discussed the latest developments with the CRC and WCRC.  A question came up regarding whether there has been any further advocacy regarding CMS expanding the criteria under which ORM may be terminated, i.e. MMI report from treating physician.  The understanding is CMS has thus far rejected any expansion.  Will have further discussions as to whether NAMSAP should advocate in this area.

Judicial:  The recent decision from the US 11th Circuit rejecting an en banc hearing on the Western Heritage case was noted.  Also noted was the well drafted dissent by Judge Tjoflat.  Please find the opinion attached.

Expansion of CMS WCMSA Amended Review:  It was stated that the Amended Review process is popular with clients and if anything, it should be expanded beyond the 12-48 month limit now in place.  It was noted though that with the policy in place less than a year and with a new WCRC contractor CMS may not be open to expanding the policy at this time.  This will be an issue we continue to monitor.

URs and the Alternative Treatment Plan:  The issue of CMS refusing to recognize URs as a basis for excluding medical care from the MSA, even the California IMR process, was raised.  The difficulty of obtaining an Alternative Treatment Plan was discussed as well as the unlikelihood of CMS changing its policy.  Nonetheless, Dan Anders volunteered to work on a draft letter to CMS regarding the issue.

As the committee’s discussions on these topics lasted the full hour we did not develop a plan of action on these issues nor recommendations to the board.  At the May meeting the goal will be to select some matters for action by the committee and recommendations to the NAMSAP Board.

Next Committee Meeting: Tuesday, May 15 at 4pm ET.  An agenda will be forwarded prior to the meeting. 

For those who have interest in participating in the collaborative efforts of the Policy and Legislative Committee, please contact Dan Anders or Katie Fox for more information.



National Alliance of Medicare Set-Aside Professionals
620 Florida St., Suite 210 | Baton Rouge, LA 70801

P: 225-454-6164 | F: 225-344-1132 |


Community Search
Sign In

Latest News

NAMSAP Partners